Wednesday, January 14, 2009

The Eye of the Needle

Jerusalem was surrounded on all sides by walls for defense from numerous enemies, like a fort, with various gates for entry from outside, most narrow enough to provide an easy defense. The narrowest of all these gates was called "The Needle", due to its extremely narrow size and length. In order for camels to pass through he Needle gate (usually called "eye of the needle" for the parable, since "passing through a needle" would make no sense to us), they had to remove all baggage and everything from the camels, then they could get through the gate. Those caravans with heavy freight surely chose a wider gate for entrance, but hence the saying.

It's easier for a camel to give up its goods and continue passage to the Holy City, or Jerusalem, than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven, which involves being willing to give up everything in the material world to enter. Most people think "give up worldly possessions", but it means leaving family behind too, also part of the material world - so it's most likely a reference to death. It's a spiritual quest, so you have to be willing to leave the material realm and your physical body.

The implication of mentioning a "rich man" is that the wealthy may be stronger bound to their possessions than someone poor, and less willing to leave the material world behind.

3 comments:

Sixth Estate said...

I hate to be the one to tell you this, but I am afraid that the Needle Gate is a myth. It's been fairly well documented now.

Jesus really is talking about the eye of a needle here, and I don't think his point is that riches are an extra burden, but that it is impossible to be rich and enter heaven (though with God it may be possible, given what he says to the disciples afterwards).

José Sinclair said...

Pope Leo X said "This myth of the Christ has served us well"

One man's mythology is another man's reality, it seems.

I've seen maps of ancient Jerusalem, and there are about nine names gates, including the needle one - guess it depends on which scholar/propagandist you're listening to.

What really irks me are the guys who get money to search for "Noah's ark" and other such nonsense. These people have missed the whole message, and apparently need proof of "God", like finding some old wood would prove anything at all, other than "this used to be a tree".

Jesus told the prince he'd have to give up his FAMILY as well to enter the kingdom, which the prince "could not do". Yet, the family is considered a major Christian thing, like it didn't exist before Christians! Jesus left his family (as did the Buddha), and never looked back. I believe this is why people enter monasteries and nunnaries, to pursue the spiritual, a life with God, without their family around to deter or influence them to more materialistic pursuits.

Personally, I don't think the history, accuracy, or reality of any of this is important at all, that's not the point of the parables. We don't really expect a camel to shrink or a needle to become huge..

Jesus said "the kingdom of heaven is within", and in another passage, "the kingdom of heaven is all around, and you can't see it". Therefore, it's not a material place based in reality at all, it's a metaphysical concept, which is the point of this site.

Anyone from about age 8 can read the Bible and get the history, proverbs, prayers, and all the materialist stuff, but it takes a lot longer to begin to understand the deeper meanings, if it ever comes at all. After 50 yrs of this, I still feel like a student myself, with much more to learn than I already think I know!

Thanks for the comment, I welcome all discourse on theology and theosophy.

.. Jose S..

Andy Doernen said...

My understanding of the parable begins with Jesus' statement that "the kingdom of heaven is all around you and you cannot see it." I believe he really does mean heaven can be experienced on earth if you understand the connectedness of all life - and that every person is your "brother" or "sister" - when you live in "heaven". Jesus singles out the "rich" because the quality that separates them from others - besides money - is they too often believe they're better than others (because of money) - and they consciously divide themselves from the "rabble". So even a rich person can live in heaven - as long as he/she doesn't believe they're better than anyone else.